Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Ferrarotti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 19:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Ferrarotti

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can’t find any sources to support the notability of the topic of this article. Mccapra (talk) 18:20, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:41, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable radio figure.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete There are other similar articles around. To be fair, all of these articles should be kept or deleted, otherwise Wikipedia is unfair and inconsistent. Cheesesteak1 (talk) 05:10, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG. Britishfinance (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.